En virksomhed kunne ikke opnå forbud mod en tidligere medarbejders konsulentarbejde for en konkurrent. Byretten havde fundet, at virksomheden havde fortabt muligheden for at håndhæve konkurrenceklausulen, og landsretten afviste kæremålet, fordi klausulperioden var udløbet.
En kundeklausul indgået i en ejeraftale kunne ikke opretholdes, fordi kapitalejeren reelt skulle betragtes som funktionær.
En kundeklausul efter funktionærloven kunne opretholdes i en ny ansættelseskontrakt, selvom ansættelsesklausulloven var trådt i kraft. Bordet fangede dog, da medarbejderen i forbindelse med opsigelsen modtog og skrev under på en klausul på andre vilkår.
En konkurrenceklausul indgået i en ejeraftale kunne opretholdes fuldt ud, selvom kapitalejeren havde afhændet sine kapitalandele, var fortsat som medarbejder og siden blev opsagt.
As of 1 January 2025, Sara Baldus has been promoted to associate partner at Norrbom Vinding.
The Supreme Court has ruled that a disabled employee in the Capital Region of Denmark should have been considered for redeployment to another vacant position outside the place of work.
New publication about workplace data privacy and new member firms in Austria and Uruguay.
The Appeals Permission Board has given the Supreme Court the opportunity to decide a case about whether an industrial injury sustained by an employee on the way to work is covered by the Workers’ Compensation Act.
The Supreme Court has established that a pilot who had worked for an airline through employment with another company could not have his claim for unpaid salary covered by the Employees’ Guarantee Fund (LG) when the airline went into bankruptcy.
Yesterday, the IEL published their Elite 2025 guide, which lists the world’s 151 leading international, national and boutique labour and employment law firms. Norrbom Vinding is among these firms.
The Eastern High Court found that a termination letter sent to an employee on the 120th day of illness, but after the end of the employee’s normal working hours, complied with the 120-day rule.
The European Court of Justice found that it did not constitute gender discrimination that flight crew and cabin crew did not receive the same daily subsistence allowances even though they worked on the same aircrafts.
It was discrimination on the grounds of religion when a day care centre required a childcare assistant who was a Jehovah’s Witness to wear a costume for the centre’s Shrovetide party.
A social and healthcare worker’s disclosure of confidential information to the daughter of a citizen did not justify summary dismissal.